The ICC publishes separate men’s player rankings for Test, ODI and T20I cricket, each split into batting, bowling and all-rounders. The nine tables below update automatically from the latest ICC rankings, so they reflect the most recent international matches. The official list is on the ICC website.
ICC Test rankings
Test batting
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Harry Brook | England | 861 |
| 2 |
|
Joe Root | England | 816 |
| 3 |
|
Travis Head | Australia | 799 |
| 4 |
|
Temba Bavuma | South Africa | 793 |
| 5 |
|
Steve Smith | Australia | 790 |
| 6 |
|
Rachin Ravindra | New Zealand | 740 |
| 7 |
|
Rishabh Pant | India | 713 |
| 8 | DM | Daryl Mitchell | New Zealand | 710 |
| 9 |
|
Shubman Gill | India | 709 |
| 10 | KM | Kamindu Mendis | Sri Lanka | 706 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
Test bowling
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Mitchell Starc | Australia | 881 |
| 2 |
|
Marco Jansen | South Africa | 875 |
| 3 |
|
Matt Henry | New Zealand | 861 |
| 4 |
|
Ollie Robinson | England | 856 |
| 5 |
|
Jasprit Bumrah | India | 853 |
| 6 |
|
Scott Boland | Australia | 821 |
| 7 |
|
Simon Harmer | South Africa | 817 |
| 8 |
|
Kagiso Rabada | South Africa | 801 |
| 9 |
|
Pat Cummins | Australia | 789 |
| 10 |
|
Josh Hazlewood | Australia | 785 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
Test all-rounders
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Marco Jansen | South Africa | 463 |
| 2 |
|
Ravindra Jadeja | India | 422 |
| 3 | WM | Wiaan Mulder | South Africa | 320 |
| 4 |
|
Mehidy Hasan Miraz | Bangladesh | 298 |
| 5 |
|
Simon Harmer | South Africa | 263 |
| 6 |
|
Mitchell Starc | Australia | 251 |
| 7 |
|
Washington Sundar | India | 234 |
| 8 |
|
Pat Cummins | Australia | 229 |
| 9 |
|
Justin Greaves | West Indies | 220 |
| 10 | GA | Gus Atkinson | England | 219 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
Test ratings move more slowly than the white-ball tables because there are fewer matches. India’s next Tests are two in New Zealand in November, which count towards the World Test Championship.
ICC Test team rankings
South Africa are the No. 1 Test team after beating Australia 2-1 in their home series, which ended in Cape Town on 31 October 2026. It is the first time South Africa have been top since January 2016. This table does not update automatically; we update it after each Test series.
| Rank | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Africa | 124 |
| 2 | Australia | 122 |
| 3 | New Zealand | 106 |
| 4 | India | 105 |
| 5 | England | 102 |
| 6 | Bangladesh | 77 |
| 7 | Sri Lanka | 75 |
| 8 | West Indies | 74 |
| 9 | Pakistan | 71 |
| 10 | Zimbabwe | 17 |
India are fourth, one rating point behind New Zealand, so the two Tests in New Zealand in November will decide which of them is third. South Africa’s series win was led by Marco Jansen, who is also No. 1 in the Test bowling and all-rounder lists. Full series report: South Africa vs Australia Test series 2026.
ICC ODI rankings
ODI batting
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Shubman Gill | India | 841 |
| 2 | DM | Daryl Mitchell | New Zealand | 794 |
| 3 |
|
Virat Kohli | India | 781 |
| 4 |
|
Rohit Sharma | India | 770 |
| 5 |
|
Ibrahim Zadran | Afghanistan | 752 |
| 6 |
|
Ben Duckett | England | 733 |
| 7 |
|
Shai Hope | West Indies | 710 |
| 8 |
|
Harry Brook | England | 674 |
| 9 |
|
Babar Azam | Pakistan | 661 |
| 10 |
|
KL Rahul | India | 653 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
ODI bowling
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Rashid Khan | Afghanistan | 760 |
| 2 |
|
Keshav Maharaj | South Africa | 660 |
| 3 | MS | Mitchell Santner | New Zealand | 644 |
| 4 |
|
Abrar Ahmed | Pakistan | 642 |
| 5 |
|
Shaheen Afridi | Pakistan | 621 |
| 6 |
|
Kuldeep Yadav | India | 620 |
| 7 | AO | Azmatullah Omarzai | Afghanistan | 610 |
| 8 |
|
Mehidy Hasan Miraz | Bangladesh | 597 |
| 9 |
|
Taskin Ahmed | Bangladesh | 595 |
| 10 | MT | Maheesh Theekshana | Sri Lanka | 595 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
ODI all-rounders
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AO | Azmatullah Omarzai | Afghanistan | 359 |
| 2 |
|
Sikandar Raza | Zimbabwe | 288 |
| 3 |
|
Mohammad Nabi | Afghanistan | 251 |
| 4 |
|
Mehidy Hasan Miraz | Bangladesh | 250 |
| 5 | MB | Michael Bracewell | New Zealand | 250 |
| 6 | MS | Mitchell Santner | New Zealand | 247 |
| 7 |
|
Rashid Khan | Afghanistan | 245 |
| 8 | BM | Brandon McMullen | SCO | 238 |
| 9 |
|
Axar Patel | India | 198 |
| 10 | CC | Curtis Campher | Ireland | 195 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
The team ODI rankings at 30 September 2026 decided the eight sides that qualified directly for the 2027 Cricket World Cup.
ICC T20I rankings
T20I batting
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AS | Abhishek Sharma | India | 889 |
| 2 | SF | Sahibzada Farhan | Pakistan | 883 |
| 3 |
|
Ishan Kishan | India | 862 |
| 4 |
|
Harry Brook | England | 793 |
| 5 |
|
Jos Buttler | England | 789 |
| 6 | DB | Dewald Brevis | South Africa | 789 |
| 7 |
|
Shreyas Iyer | India | 777 |
| 8 |
|
Phil Salt | England | 775 |
| 9 |
|
Shai Hope | West Indies | 759 |
| 10 | PN | Pathum Nissanka | Sri Lanka | 720 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
T20I bowling
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Rashid Khan | Afghanistan | 731 |
| 2 |
|
Adam Zampa | Australia | 700 |
| 3 |
|
Adil Rashid | England | 695 |
| 4 |
|
Abrar Ahmed | Pakistan | 695 |
| 5 | MS | Mitchell Santner | New Zealand | 676 |
| 6 | NE | Nathan Ellis | Australia | 675 |
| 7 |
|
Jamie Overton | England | 674 |
| 8 |
|
Nasum Ahmed | Bangladesh | 661 |
| 9 | MH | Mahedi Hasan | Bangladesh | 654 |
| 10 | LD | Liam Dawson | England | 648 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
T20I all-rounders
Latest source update: 4 Nov 2026
| Rank | Profile | Player | Team | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Sikandar Raza | Zimbabwe | 331 |
| 2 | SA | Saim Ayub | Pakistan | 290 |
| 3 | AO | Azmatullah Omarzai | Afghanistan | 279 |
| 4 |
|
Roston Chase | West Indies | 258 |
| 5 |
|
Will Jacks | England | 257 |
| 6 |
|
Dipendra Singh Airee | Nepal | 255 |
| 7 | GE | Gerhard Erasmus | Namibia | 213 |
| 8 |
|
Rashid Khan | Afghanistan | 201 |
| 9 | MS | Mitchell Santner | New Zealand | 200 |
| 10 |
|
Sam Curran | England | 190 |
Rankings data source: InsideSport ICC Rankings. Ranking methodology is defined by the ICC. ICC ranking methodology.
How ICC player ratings are calculated
Every player has a rating between 0 and 1000 points, and the ranking is simply their position in the table by rating. A rating above 900 is regarded as exceptional. The ratings are worked out by a computer program from match scorecards, with no human judgement involved.
The rating is a weighted average of a player’s whole career, but recent matches count the most. A great series lifts a rating quickly, and its effect fades as newer matches are added.
What counts for batters
- Runs scored, adjusted for how many runs were scored in the match. A hundred in a low-scoring match is worth more than one in a run-fest.
- The strength of the bowling attack, based on the bowlers’ own ratings.
- Whether the batter was not out, which earns a bonus.
- The match result, with extra credit for wins against highly rated teams.
What counts for bowlers
- Wickets taken and runs conceded, adjusted for the scoring level of the match.
- The quality of the batters dismissed. Removing a top-rated batter is worth more than a tail-ender.
- Workload, so bowlers who send down a lot of overs get credit.
- The match result, again weighted towards wins over strong teams.
All-rounders
The all-rounder rating multiplies a player’s batting and bowling ratings and divides by 1000. A batter rated 600 who bowls to a rating of 500 scores 300, which the ICC treats as world class.
New players
Newcomers cannot jump straight to the top. In Tests, a batter’s rating is scaled down until they have played 40 innings: they carry 70 per cent of their full rating after 10 innings. Bowlers reach a full rating at 100 Test wickets, with 70 per cent after 30.
Where the ratings came from
The system began in 1987, at the suggestion of former England captain Ted Dexter, as a way to measure current form better than career averages do. The ICC later adopted it as the official player rankings.
The all-rounder formula, worked through
The all-rounder rating confuses many readers, so we have worked through three made-up players using the ICC formula (batting rating multiplied by bowling rating, divided by 1000).
| Player type | Batting rating | Bowling rating | All-rounder rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced all-rounder | 600 | 500 | 300 |
| Top batter who bowls a little | 850 | 150 | 128 |
| Bowling all-rounder | 350 | 700 | 245 |
Because the two ratings are multiplied, a player needs to be good at both skills to rank highly. A world-class batter with a weak bowling rating scores lower than a solid player who does both. That is why the all-rounder lists often look very different from the batting and bowling lists.
KhelGossip’s view: read the rankings as a form guide, not a verdict
The ICC system is fair and fully automatic, but it has two features fans often miss. First, it leans heavily on recent matches, so a player who has not played for a few months can slide down the table without doing anything wrong. Second, the scaling for new players means a young Test batter cannot carry a full rating until 40 innings, however good they are.
For Indian fans this matters most in T20Is, where India play a lot of cricket and their players move up and down quickly. In our view, the rankings are the best quick guide to who is in form right now. They are not a verdict on who is the better player over a career. For India’s Test picture, the WTC points table tells you more.
Player tables update automatically from the latest ICC rankings. Test team rankings and text updated 2 November 2026, after South Africa vs Australia. Worked examples are KhelGossip calculations using the ICC formula. Main source: the ICC’s explanation of its ratings.